点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
DT51在北京启幕 区域商业消费迈入新篇章******
中新网1月16日电 日前，北京北部地区迎来区域内全新零售概念百货DT51的正式开业。作为今年备受关注的商业项目之一，DT51地处北京十二五重点规划的六个功能区域之一的亚奥社区，是根据北京市政府提出的“发挥自身优势，下沉赋能社区零售，给市民群众提供良好的消费体验”要求下进行的改造试点，不仅能有效辐射周边上百万中高端社区居民，助力北京市民消费提档升级，还为年轻时尚家庭顾客带来了创新商业零售概念和优质生活消费体验。从这一刻起，一个时尚生活方式目的地，一个可以愉快探索生活之美、畅快自由表达、感受美好生活之地精彩呈现，而区域商业消费亦由此迎来新篇章。
DT51在北京启幕创新商业零售概念
DT51塑造的是一个全新的美学空间维度，跳脱了过去千篇一律的购物环境，这里将科技、艺术与时尚紧密结合，从建筑设计到艺术装置，从每个楼层不同的渐变色调到与知名调香大师合作定制商场专属香调，从量身打造馆内所有播放音乐到赋予品牌更多可能性，DT51着力营造出具有独特体验的沉浸式购物空间，创造着商品消费环节之外的精彩。
在一层入口处设置了《袋鼠领地》艺术装置在一层入口处设置了《袋鼠领地》艺术装置，多种形态的31只袋鼠用摇晃的动作，组成一个变化有序的阵列，共同构成了不稳定感与奇观感。四层的《花花奇遇》装置，由四种形态的56只兔子组成，分布在四个方向，顾客可通过蹲起、抬臂等动作与它们互动，而兔子们便会给予相应的动作反馈。此外，还有由植绒技术制作按照真实斑马同比例放大的斑马毛绒玩具等。这些趣味十足的互动设计，不仅给顾客带来了极致的感官体验，还让人备感轻松愉悦，而这也正是DT51想传递的一种快乐理念，希望每一个来到这里的人，都能暂时“逃离”生活的喧嚣，让纷乱的情绪得到治愈，感受童真般的快乐。
四层的《花花奇遇》装置，由四种形态的56只兔子组成优质生活消费体验
DT51旨在为精致美好生活提供全方位选择，这里汇集了包括化妆品、时尚名品、母婴儿童、运动休闲、家居家电、高端超市、精选餐饮等全方位消费品类，并精选了国内外知名品牌入驻，为消费者全力打造优质时尚生活甄选目的地。
进入DT51，首先映入眼帘的是融合历史和现代想象的美妆区域，这里集齐了20多个国际一线高端化妆品品牌的主力店，不仅有CHANEL、DIOR、LANC?ME等诸多知名品牌，还有彩妆品牌HOURGLASS北京首店，CHARLOTTE TILBURY北京百货首柜等。除此之外，同场的DT SELECT BEAUTY美妆集合店更是汇聚跨越护肤、彩妆、香氛、生活方式四大品类近100个国际知名品牌和新锐小众及跨境品牌，并且其中包括了20多个全国首发品牌。同样位于商场一层的时尚名品区域，还集聚了BURBERRY、BOSS等十余个国际时尚品牌和DE BEERS等三个珠宝品牌。
DT SELECT多品牌集合店
值得一提的是，DT51在每层都设置了大面积的DT SELECT多品牌集合店，汇聚了众多国际名品和设计师品牌。位于商场二层的DT SELECT FASHION主要是精品设计师集合店，位于商场三层的是现代时尚及女鞋集合店，在商场四层的DT SELECT MOM&ME集合店，从家具、玩具、母婴用品到服装，也完全区别于市面上其他的亲子用品店。
DT51内的书店在DT51，还特别为孩子们打造了一个拥有中外文精选儿童书籍的专门店——RENDEZ VOUS KIDS，针对0-14岁不同年龄儿童进行选品，除了拥有益智互动、中英文绘本、学龄前教育、低幼科普、艺术启蒙、少儿英语、少儿文学、国外文学为主、动画IP类书籍，还会联合出版社不定期举办优质的文化、早教活动，为家庭顾客提供高品质的亲子时光。
DT51内餐饮店北京厨房商场六层和七层精选了13家不同菜系的品质餐厅，供京北消费者选择，有环境优雅的包间为家庭型聚餐提供更为舒适、私密的就餐环境，其中侘与火餐厅是北京的首店。与此同时，在商场的其他楼层也都配备了咖啡、甜品、轻食简餐等多元化选择，商场地下一层还设置有美食街、BHG MARKET PLACE高级超市等，致力于全时段全方位满足顾客多元餐饮消费需求。
另据了解，DT51紧邻奥林匹克中心，乘坐5号或15号地铁到达大屯路东站，步行数百米即可到达。DT51的到来，为亚奥商圈带来了来自家门口的美好生活方式。即日起，到DT51，会员消费每1元积1分，使用DT51小程序还可自助兑换积分礼金。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)